Skip to main content

Full text of "Review on possible gravitational anomalies"

See other formats


Review on possible Gravitational Anomalies 

'rCr{ • Xavier E. Amador 

O '. Centre de Investigacion y Estudios Avanzados, CINVESTAV, Dept. of Physics, Av. IPN 2508, 

O ■ 07000 Ciudad de Mexico, D.F., Mexico 

(N ■ 

E-mail: xamadorSf is.cinvestav.mx 

D 

^^ ' Abstract. This is an updated introductory review of 2 possible gravitational anomalies that 

has attracted part of the scientific community: the AUais effect that occur during solar eclipses, 
and the Pioneer 10 spacecraft anomaly, experimented also by Pioneer 11 and Ulysses spacecrafts. 

^vj I It seems that, to date, no satisfactory conventional explanation exist to these phenomena, and 

^ . this suggest that possible new physics will be needed to account for them. The main purpose of 

Q^ ' this review is to announce 3 other new measurements that will be carried on during the 2005 

\^ solar eclipses in Panama and Colombia (Apr. 8) and in Portugal (Oct. 15). 

o' 
o. 

\^ , The interest on this type of anomalous behaviours consist in that they could be a signal of 

slight departures from the known gravitational laws, which translates into new physics. Mexico 



o 



O ■ has been witness of this interest in the last 2 meetings: 2nd Mexican Meeting on Mathematical 



7 



and Experimental Physics [T], D.F., Mexico, sep. 2004, where M. Nieto introduced us to the 
problem and in this VI Mexican School on Gravitation and Mathematical Physics, "Approaches 
to Quantum Gravity", Playa del Carmen, Quintana Roo, Mexico, nov. 2004. 



p\ ' 1. Description of the Problem 

j^ ■ In June 30, 1954, Maurice AUais [2\ (french physicist, winner of the 1988 Nobel Prize in Eco- 

nomics, winner of the 1959 Galabert Prize of the French Astronautical Society, and also a 
laureated of the United States Gravity Research Foundation due to his gravitational experi- 
ments) reported that a Foucault pendulum exhibited anomalous movements at the time of a 
solar eclipse that cannot be explained by conventional effects [disturbances of an aleatory order, 
periodic luni-solar effects, indirect influence of some conventional factors like seismic activity, 
temperature changes, atmospheric pressure, magnetism, etc.]. In October 22, 1959, he observed 
analogous deviations in a paraconical pendulum that he invented. Even the famous Werner 
von Braun (german rocket scientist at NASA's Marshall Space Flight Center) encouraged Al- 
lais to publish his results. The study of anomalous behaviours (of pendulums) during (total 
and partial) solar eclipses has been repeated with torsion pendulums [3j, and the variation in 
gravity [~ 6 x 10~^ cm /s'^] during the eclipses has been studied with gravimeters [4J and other 
devices (atomic clocks [5 1), and some groups report positive results (supporting the existence 
of anomalous phenomena), but others report no detection of the phenomena and some has 
reported ambiguos results. The point is that many countries and space agencies around the 
world has been extremely curious about this phenomena and has carried out several experi- 
ments to try to confirm if these are real, and to explain them in conventional or unconven- 



tional terms (see for example: http://science.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/ast06aug99_l.htmii 



http://ams.astro.univie.ac. at/^nendwich/Science/SoFi/allais2.h tml[ 
http://science.nasa.gov/newhome/headlines/astl2oct99_l.htm). 

If these anomahes turn out to be new gravitational physics, there can be a relation to the 
Pioneer anomaly and/or the anomalous rotation curves of galaxies, as NASA has suggested 
(see the cited URL's). The Pioneer 10 (launched in 1972) anomaly is a sunward small (radial) 
acceleration [~ 8(+3) x 10~^cm/s^ ^ 0.1 nano-g, where g = 980cm/s^] first detected in 1980, 
but reported in Sept. 24, 1998 after detailed analysis of the Doppler shifted radio data from 
the spacecraft [6]: the probe is moving as if it were subject to a "new, unknown force" pointing 
towards the Sun. The same constant acceleration imparted by this force has been detected in 
2 more spacecraft: Pioneer 11 (launched in 1973) and Ulysses (launched in 1990). All probes 
are following trajectories that cannot be explained by conventional physics: based on General 
Relativity computations of their trajectories under the gravitational pull of the known bodies 
in the solar system (the Sun playing the major role), they are not in the position where they 
should be (the discrepancy amounts to approx. 248,500 miles (~ 400, 000 km), almost the Earth- 
Moon distance). This anomalous acceleration was also detected in Galileo probe (unreliable 
data) but not in the Voyager. The European Space Agency (ESA) announced in the Cosmic 
Vision workshop at UNESCO, in sept. 2004, that it will consider plans for a number of high 
precision experiments/missions that will test the Pioneer anomaly directly. If this anomalous 
acceleration can not be explained away by some mundane systematic effect, it would be a 
slight departure from the predictions of General Relativity, i.e., new physics. As to date, no 
conventional explanation has been found. It was remarked (see [7] and cited references) that 
the order of magnitude of the gravity variations measured by the gravimeters during the solar 
eclipses, that of the spacecrafts anomaly and that of the critical acceletarion set by MOdified 
iVewtonian /dynamics (MOND, an alternative to Dark Matter) |^ are all the same: 10~^cm/s^. 



2. Allais' effect 

A Foucault's pendulum [FP] hangs from a special joint that permits free rotation around the 
vertical and it can track the Earth's rotation. Before and after the 1954 and 1959 (partial) solar 
eclipses the plane of oscillation of a FP and of a " paraconical" pendulum (one which is suspended 
via a small steel ball bearing, which is capable of rolling in all directions upon a plane horizontal 
surface) experienced normal constant clockwise rotation, with an average angular velocity of 0.19 
degrees per minute. But at the begining of the eclipse the angular velocity of the oscillation plane 
changed abruptedly an average of 13.5 degrees per minute, counterclockwise! (fig.l, a). This 
huge sudden change in the sense and in the rotation of the oscillation plane persisted throughout 
the length (2.5 hours) of the eclipse. Similar experiments with desfavorable conclusions were 
reported in [9]. 




Figure 1. a) change in the angular velocity of the oscillation plane observed by Allais; b) 
gravity variation measured by a gravimeter, during a solar eclipse in 1997, see Yang and Wang 



m 



m- 



2.1. Conventional possible (local) explanations 

There has been several studies [7J that try to explain this effect: seismic disturbances due to 
increased human activity before and just after an eclipse; gravitational effects of an increased 
density of an air mass spot (pressure changes) due to cooling of the upper atmosphere, or due 
to tidal waves on the shell of the Earth; tilt due to temperature changes of the soil and other 
atmospheric influences; tilt due to atmospheric loading; instrumental (systematic) errors during 
the measurement and other effects on the instruments (for example, thermal expansion of the 
pendulums, etc.).B 

Incredible enough, all conventional mundane possibilities proposed so far do not work. It's 
suspected that a gravitational effect is the cause of this phenomenon. Even though testing 
gravitational variations to verify the effects of a solar eclipse is a difficult enterprise (due to the 
short duration of an eclipse it is difficult to conduct many tests), several observers in a distributed 
global network of observing stations have done it, using different kinds of instruments, inside 
and outside buildings, far away from populated areas, ruling out in this way instrumental errors, 
seismic effects, atmospheric and temperature changes, etc. The analysis of the pressure and 
temperature changes in the atmosphere indicates that these lag behind the eclipse shadow by 
several minutes, so it's difficult to explain the abrupt changes observed in the instruments. 
Other similar effects are too small to account for the magnitude of the observed phenomena. 
The observation of the anomalies has been repeated also using torsion pendumlums [3]: the 
period of oscillation of the pendulum showed a considerable increase during the solar eclipse 
and, according to [3], this was caused by a change in the tension (produced by the weight) of 
the wire, which means a change in the local gravitational field. There are also reports of a 
gravitational variation measured by gravimeters (fig.l, b) f^. The gravitational variations were 
about ~ 6 X 10^®cm/s^ (1 x 10~^cm/s^ = 1 micro-gal). The observation with 2 atomic clocks 
reported strange effects in time measurements [5] during various solar eclipses (sept. 23, 1987, 
mar. 18, 1988, Jul. 22, 1990). However, it seems that all measurements carried out so far has not 
been conclusive. Also, not all experiments report positive results. So the issue is still uncertain. 

It was suggested [7] that a global measurement under strictly controlled conditions 
is needed in order to determine whether these effects are real, so several issues must be 
under control simultaneously during the next solar eclipse experiments/observations: a) many 
observing stations (those that lie directly under the path of the total eclipse) in different locations 
are needed: it's necessary a global effort of a worldwide network of scientists collaborating on 
a single eclipse, like the one (unfinished!) carried out by NASA in 1999 (see the NASA's 
URLs) ; b) several and different instruments must be used simultaneously at several museums 
observing with Foucault pendulums, at other places using other types of pendulums (paraconical, 
torsion) composed of different materials, using gravimeters, etc.; c) station's locations must be 
protected/shielded against: seismic activities, atmospheric pressure and temperature changes, 
and to monitor these with the appropiate equipment, etc. 

2.2. Non Conventional explanations 

If the anomalies are real, why only occur during a solar eclipse? The Sun- Moon-Earth system is 
nearly aligned about once a month (on new moon). So, why nobody has noticed it before? May 
be due to the smallness of the effect and the instrumental resolution. Even though the situation 
is far from clear, several radical explanations have been invoked: a possible anisotropy of space 
(different properties of space in different directions), gravitational waves and solar radiation, 
effects related wit MOND, Sun's gravity effects on Dark Matter flux in the Solar system [lOj . 
Majorana shielding of gravity., effects related to the Pioneer anomaly, etc.B 

If these effects are related to the spacecrafts anomaly, then more unconventional ideas are 
available. In the cited NASA's URLs, there is a list of published results by many scientiflc 
institutions around the world. 



3. Pioneer Anomaly 

3.1. Possible causes 

Conventional. Science teaches us always to look first for conventional explanations: a) 
researches believed that the anomaly is probably caused by the space probes themselves, 
perhaps due to heat or gas emission (outgassing or thermal radiation), or some systematic effect 
associated with the spacecraft, etc.; b) other causes could be some subtle effects associated with 
the tracking systems, which would be of extreme importance to know for, if it turns out to be 
the cause, understanding the anomaly could help space navigation engineers to build better, 
more stable, less noisy, quieter spacecrafts with high-precision navigation systems for future 
missions; c) solar radiation pressure (the solar photons, by impacting the probes, transfer a 
tiny momentum to them) or other interactions between the solar wind (charged particles and 
ions) and the spacecrafts; d) possible corruption to the radio Doppler data; e) wobbles and other 
changes in Earth's rotation could affect the way in which the signal is received; f) The Aerospace 
Corporation (http://www.aero.org/news/current/force.html) made an independent computer 
based analysis of the motions and ruled out errors in JPL's orbital determination software (JPL 
= Jet Propulsion Lab., ) as the source of the anomalous, and also ruled out the following possible 
causes: unkown perturbations from gravity of the Kuiper belt and gravity from the galaxy, errors 
in the planetary ephemeris, errors in the values of the Earth's orientation-precession-nutation, 
nongravitational effects from solar pressure and control maneuvers, solar wind and interplanetary 
medium, nominal thermal radiation and plutonium half-life, drifting clocks, unknown general 
relativity corrections and the speed of gravity effects, hardware problems at the tracking stations, 
etc. ■ 

So far, the researchers have not found that any of these effects can account for the size 
and direction of the anomalous acceleration. Even thought in the exhaustive analysis it was 
considered and ruled out many possible causes, it's expected that the explanation will involve 
conventional normal physics. However, it is also considered the possiblity or insinuation of 'new 
(overlooked) physics', since "no unambiguous, onboard systematic problem has been discovered" . 

Unconventional [11] (New physics?) a) Possible modifications to Gravity (Einstein's 
General Relativity) based on modern theoretical ideas in Quantum Gravity suggest that it's 
necessary; ideas are: gravity might attract a little harder than expected at large distances or 
small accelerations, so dark matter is not necessary or that gravity tugs slightly harder at things 
farther away, and others suggest some new things, but several models have to deal with the 
serious problem that if the anomalous acceleration is due to gravity then these effects would 
also be seen in planetary motions (Earth and Mars) and the data don't support this, so the 
effect can not be universal; b) Possible influence of Dark Matter [DM]: the deceleration could be 
due to the gravitational attraction of DM or that the sun influences the galactic flow of cold DM 
through the solar system [10], although it's generally argued that these explanations can't be 
correct because to create the measured anomalous acceleration, a big amount of DM is required 
to be in our solar system and it would have affected also the motions of other bodies and besides, 
DM effects are presumed to operate at galactic scales and there is no evidence of it influencing 
anything on smaller scales such as in our solar system; c) Asymmetry between matter and 
anti-matter: gravity works differently on antimatter than matter; d) Existence of a bulk scalar 
field, or the Quintessence?; e) Extrange new ideas: the anomaly is not related to the motion of 
the spaceship, but it's a consequence of the acceleration of the cosmological proper time with 
respect to the coordinate parametric time, which is an effect of the background gravitational 
potential of the entire universe, or that the anomaly is due to the existence of a Mirror matter 
(mirror gas or dust) in our solar system (and idea from the Mirror symmetry in String theories); 
f) New ones based on attempts to go beyond the Standard Model of particle physics: could 
have a relation with Loop Quantum Gravity and the inverse of the cosmological constant, which 
could establish a new distance scale, which can be used to build an natural acceleration constant 



that has the same order of magnitude as the anomaly, Strings/Branes theories in the context 
of Brane- World scenarios, higher dimensions of space introduce new degrees of freedom and 
could provide weak forces on the scale of the solar system, possible violations of space-time 
symmetries such as Lorentz symmetry; g) Others: consult the meeting at Center for Applied 
Space Technology and Microgravity (ZARM), University Bremen, Germany, held in May 18, 
2004 (http://www.zarm.uni-bremen.de/Pioneer). ■ 

None of the current proposal (conventional or not) can, so far, explain satisfactorily the 
Pioneer anomaly. It is therefore vital to test gravity more precisely. Researchers at NASA's 
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, at the Center for Applied Space Technology and Microgravity of the 
University Bremen, Germany and at the Los Alamos National Laboratory want to reanalyse 
earlier and less precise Pioneer data. It's important to remark again that even though all this 
could suggest exciting new ideas and possibilities, many of the researchers involved directly in 
these matters support the idea that the most likely cause of the anomalous acceleration is a 
conventional one. To date, there are numerous proposals to gather more data: it's has been 
proposed that NASA's future deep space mission to Pluto (with improved new technologies), 
could provide more high-quality data for investigating the anomaly; also, the European Space 
Agency confirmed in the Cosmic Vision Workshop (at UNESCO, Sept. 15-16, 2004) that it's 
planning to launch (if funded, in 2015) a mission devoted solely for the study of this anomaly. 

4. Future developements 

Measurements of the anomalous behaviours during solar eclipses can be done with instruments 
that are not so difficult to gather. The opportunity is now at hand at the 2005 solar eclipses 
in Panama, Colombia and Portugal. Several teams are already planning to perform more 
measurements. 

Acknowledgments 

We want to thank Dra. Elena Caceres (CINVESTAV and Brown Univ.) and Dr. Hector Hugo 
Garcia-Compean (CINVESTAV) for their encouragement and support. 

References 

[1] Nieto M, Turyshev S and Anderson J 2004 The Pioneer Anomaly: The Data, its Meaning, and a Future Test 
(To be published in the AIP Conference Proceedings of the 2nd Mexican Meeting on Mathematical and 



Experimental Physics, Mexico City, Mexico, 6-10 Sep 2004) Preprint gr-qc/0411077 



Turyshev S, Nieto M and Anderson J 2004 Lessons Learned from the Pioneers 10/11 for a Mission to Test the 

Pioneer Anomaly (invited talk given at "35th COSPAR Scientific Assembly," Jul. 18, 2004, Paris, France) 

Preprint gr-qc/0409117 
[2] AUais MFC 1957 C.R. French Academy of Science 245 2001 

AUais MFC 1959 French Academy of Sciences C.R.A.S. 245 1875, 245 2001, 244 2469, 245 2467, 245 

2170 
Gillies G T 1990 American J. of Physics58 525-534 
[3] Saxl E and Allen M 1971 Phys. Rev. D3 823 

UUakko K, Liu Y. Xie Z 1991 The 1990 solar eclipse as seen by a torsion pendulum, (Proceedings of the 25th 

Annual Conference of the Finnish Physical Society 1 p (SEE N92-10362 01-70), 1991) 
Kuusela T 1991 Effect of the solar eclipse on the period of a torsion pendulum Phys. Rev. D43 204 
Juo L, Jianguo L, Xuerong Z, Liakhovets V, Lomonosov M and Ragyn A 1991 Observation of 1990 solar 

eclipse by a torsion pendulum Phys. Rev. D44 2611 
Kuusela T 1992 New measurements with a torsion pendulum during the solar eclipse Gen. Relativ. and 

Gravitation 24 543 
[4] Ducarme B, Sun H P, d'Oreye N, van Ruymbeke M and Mena Jara J 1999 Interpretation of the tidal residuals 

during the 11 July 1991 total solar eclipse, J. of Geodesy 73 53 
Mishra D Cand Rao MBS 1997 Temporal variations in gravity field during solar eclipse on 24 October 

Current Science 72 783 



Wang Q S, Yang X S, Wu C Z, Guo H G, Liu H C and Hua C C 2000 Precise measurement of gravity 

variations during a total solar eclipse Phys. Rev. D 62 041101 
Yang X S and Wang Q S 2002 Gravity anomaly during the Mohe total solar eclipse and new constraint on 

gravitational shielding parameter Astrophys. Space Sci. 282 245 
Unnikrishnan C S, Mohapatra A K and Gillies G T 2001 Anomalous gravity data during the 1997 total solar 

eclipse do not support the hypothesis of gravitational shielding Phys. Rev. D 63 062002 
Tang K, Wang Q, Zhang H, Hua C, Peng F and Hu K 2003 Gravity effects of solar eclipse and inducted 
gravitational field Am. Geophys. Union, Fall Meeting 2003, Abstract G32A-0735 (Eos Trans. AGU, 84(46), 
Fall Meet. Suppl, Abstract G32A-0735, 2003) 
van Ruymbeke M, Shaoming L, Mansinha L and Meurers B 2003 Search for the gravitational absorption 
effect using spring and super-conducting gravimeters during the total solar eclipse of August 11, 1999, 
Bull, dinformation de Marees Terrestres (BIM) 138 10967 
Mihaila I, Marcov N, Pambuccian V and Agop M 2003 Observation de leffet dAUais lors de leclipse de Soleil 
du 11 Agout 1999 Proc. Romanian Academy AA 1 
[5] Zhou S W and Huang B J 1992 Abnormalities of the time comparisons of atomic clocks during the solar 

eclipses Nuovo Cimento C15 133-137 
[6] Anderson J, Nieto M, Laing P, Liu A, Lau E, Turyshev S 2001 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 2858 {Preprint 
[gF^ 0104064) 
Anderson J, Nieto M, Laing P, Liu A, Lau E, Turyshev S 2002 Phys. Rev. D 65 082004 
Anderson J, Nieto M, Laing P, Liu A, Lau E, Turyshev S 1998 Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 2858 [Preprint 
[ir^c/9808081| ) 
[7] Duif C 2004 A review of conventional explanations of anomalous observations during solar eclipses (to be 
pubished in Proc. of the Conference on the Pioneer Anomaly, Bremen, Germany, 18-19 May, 2004) Preprint 
gr-qc/ 0408023 
[8] Sanders R and McGaugh S 2002 Modified Newtonian Dynamics as an Alternative to Dark Matter 

Ann.Rev.Astron.Astrophys. 40 263-317 (Preprint astro-ph/0204521 ) 
[9] Savrov L A 1997 Experiment with paraconic pendulums during the November 3, 1994 solar eclipse in Brazil 
Measurement Techniques 40 511 
[10] Sikivie P andWick S 2002 Solar Wakes of Dark Matter Flows Phys. Rev. D66 023504 (Preprint 

astro-ph/0203448) 
[11] Kowalski-GUkman J and Smolin L 2004 Triply special relativity Phys. Rev. D70 065020 

Bertolami O and Paramos J 2004 The Pioneer anomaly in the context of the braneworld scenario 

Class. Quant. Grav. 21 3309 (Preprini gr-qc/0310101 ) 

Mbelek J P 2004 General relativity and quintessence explain the Pioneer anomaly Preprint gr-qc/0407023| 
Ranada A F 2004 The Pioneer anomaly as an effect of the dynamics of time Prepnni'gr-qc/04 03013| 
Foot R and Volkas R R 2001 A mirror world explanation for the Pioneer spacecraft anomalies? Phys. Lett. 
B517 13 (Prepnni |hep-ph/010805l|